Elohim Articles

Historic Events Articles

Sacred Name Articles

Feast Day Articles

Misc. Articles


The Oklahoma City Bombing

    The explosions that demolished the Alfred E. Murrah federal building took place in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.  168 Americans died as a result, including a number of little children attending a day-care center housed in the building.  The United States government has declared and steadfastly maintains that it was a fertilizer bomb, inside a Ryder truck parked in front of the building that caused the damage.  We have already learned, that what the government claims happened in tragic situations like this is totally unreliable and unbelievable.

    Benton K. Partin, a retired Brigadier General and 31 year veteran of the U.S. Air Force, is a premiere expert on explosives.  He served as commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Lab, and was responsible for munitions development for the armed services.  He is a recognized expert as a major guiding force of our modern, precision, guided, weapons system.  In his report, he declares:

    "It is impossible that the destruction to the building could have resulted from such a bomb alone.

    "To cause the damage pattern that occurred to the Murrah Building, there would have to have been demolition charges at several supporting column bases, at locations not accessible from the street, to supplement the truck bomb damage.  Indeed, a careful examination of photographs showing the collapsed column bases reveals a failure mode produced by demolition charges and not a blast from the truck bomb . . .

   "Blast through air is very inefficient energy coupling mechanism against heavily reinforced concrete beams and columns . . .

   "By Contrast, heavily reinforced concrete structures can be destroyed effectively through detonation of explosives in contact with the reinforced concrete beams and columns . . . The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb.  The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building."  Bomb Damage Analysis of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. July 30, 1995 by Benton K. Partin

   Thus, we see that it was impossible for the truck bomb to have destroyed the Murrah Building.  Somebody had access to the Murrah Building, and knew where the reinforced structural columns were.  They had access to the building plans, and placed the bombs that destroyed the building.

   Newspaper reporters on the scene shortly after the building collapsed reported that workers were removing bombs that did not go off from within the building.  The bombs that did explode did not explode simultaneously.  The bomb blasts were recorded on two seismometers, one at the Omniplex Museum, 4.34 miles northeast, and the other at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, 16.25 miles to the southeast.  Both recorded two separate, closely spaced explosions of approximately equal intensity.

    Also, several highly credible witnesses reported hearing separate explosions.  Shortly after the explosions, the bomb squad defused one unexploded bomb inside the building, and were working on a second.

    There is an emerging pattern here.  When President Kennedy was killed, it was declared that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had committed the crime.  When the Murrah building blew up, it was declared that one man was primarily responsible, Timothy McVeigh.  One man taking the wrap, while others go free.

    During a live-feed video interview, an Assistant Fire Chief on the scene stated that the bomb squad was at the Murrah building at seven o'clock that morning, two hours before the bombing took place.  What were they doing there two hours before the bombing?

    Immediately after the explosions, Mayor Ron Nordick, Dr. Randall Heather, Governor Frank Keating, and numerous news anchors stated that the FBI and ATF had confirmed that high explosive bombs were taken out of the building.  Now, the official story is that it was a fertilizer bomb, from the Ryder truck.  Were the governor, the mayor and the news anchors lying, or were they just not briefed in time for everyone to get their stories straight?

    "The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms had offices in the Murrah Building.  On the day the Murrah building was bombed, none of the ATF agents came to work that morning.  The ATF agents, who had children in the day-care center, did not drop their children off that day.  There were no ATF agents or their children on the casualty list of the Oklahoma City bombing." Freedom Network News  June/July 1996 p. 5, 6

    Do you suppose that they knew what was going to happen to the building?

    On a radio talk show ten days after the bombing,  "[Mark] Boswell interviewed 28 year CIA veteran James Black and assistant Ron Jackson regarding sworn affidavits now in their possession, sworn by two Justice Department officials which state that they were part of a  'Committee of 10' who planned the Oklahoma bombing." Cherith Chronicle May-June, 1995 p. 5 by Martin O de Brook

    The question we must ask our self is, who benefited?

    Why did Clinton demand the most draconian police state legislation ever proposed in the United States so quickly after the blast?  This proposed legislation was so well organized that it was obvious it had been prepared long before the destruction of the building.

    Why was a blizzard of domestic terrorism bills rushed into Congress in a matter of days after the bombing?  These laws include the banning of virtually all privately owned firearms.

    There were liberty-restricting measures in Congress just prior to the Oklahoma City bombing that were stalled.  Right after the bombing they were immediately passed.

    Congress doesn't have to wait for some bombing incident to pass laws flushing the Constitution.  The government pulls off these desolations only to make it seem credible in the minds of Americans.

    Who is behind the scenes leading  "American" politicians to destroy civil liberty in America?  Who has had satanic hatred of our liberties for over 200 years?  Not Islam!, Not Sadam Hussein!  Yes, the pope and the Jesuits of Rome!

    "The Vatican condemned the Declaration of Independence as  'wickedness'. . .  and called the Constitution of the United States  'a Satanic document'."  The Dollar and the Vatican p. 26 by Avro Manhattan 

     A former priest tells us how the Jesuit mind thinks,

    "We will rule the United States, and lay them at the feet of the Vicar of Jesus Christ [the pope], that he may put an end to their Godless system of education, and impious laws of liberty of conscience which are an insult to God and man." --Charles Chiniquy Fifty Years in the Church of Rome p. 282

    Never forget the verse, "In her [the Catholic church] was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth." Revelation 18:24

Back to Index

For More Information write:

 The Oil Derrick  P.O. 574 Erin TN 37061

Webmaster eMail: